|
Calves
can gain weight without eating from a silver spoon.
The silver spoon in this case is the work of baling and moving hay
from fields to lots.
Preliminary
University of Nebraska research shows calves gain more weight grazing
hay cut and left in windrows, than eating hay cut and baled from
the same field.
Jerry
Volesky, a forage scientist at NU's West Central Research and Extension
Center in North Platte, wondered if calves could gain at least one-half
pound per day grazing hay left in windrows. They did.
Windrow
grazing also eliminated the need to bale, haul and feed the hay.
"Grazing
windrows certainly looks like it will be a practice that will save
some production costs," Volesky said. Big, round baling runs
$8-10 per acre, plus the cost of hauling and feeding bales in drylot
pens. Volesky is calculating exactly how much windrow grazing would
save.
Two
years of Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources research
in subirrigated Sandhills meadows showed weaned calves grazing windrows
for 70 days averaged 531 pounds, compared with 507 pounds for calves
eating baled hay. Average daily gain was 1.17 pounds for the windrow
calves, compared with .85 pounds for the calves fed baled hay.
Calves
gained more weight, Volesky said, because they also were able to
graze some high-quality green grass that was available even into
December 1997 because of a mild fall.
Meadow
forage in the 1997 and 1998 trials included smooth brome, slender
wheatgrass, sedges and clover. In May, the meadow was heavily grazed
for two weeks, which delayed maturity. Cattle were removed, and
the grass was fertilized and allowed to grow until late August.
Hay was cut by mid-September and raked into windrows 30 feet apart,
center to center. Alternate windrows were baled into 1,000-pound
round bales.
The
trials entailed 48 450-pound calves in two groups. Twenty-four calves
grazed windrowed hay, eight per acre, from mid-November through
January. Calves grazed for up to two weeks on one acre, then the
fence was moved to graze another acre.
Calves
eating baled hay were in drylot pens and fed hay from alternate
windrows.
Both
sets of calves had supplemental minerals and salt.
Although
calves grazing windrow hay had better weight gain, twice as much
hay was wasted. Volesky found drylot calves wasted 12 percent of
the hay, while windrow-grazing calves wasted 26 percent. Mature
cows grazed windrow-trampled hay after calves were removed, with
final waste estimated at a more acceptable 18 percent.
Although
electric fence and posts were moved every couple weeks, posts had
a nail-like tip that was relatively easy to drive into the frozen
ground. Moving fence took considerably less time than baling, hauling
bales and feeding baled hay, Volesky said.
The
idea for windrow feeding came from Canada, where a "good number"
of ranchers incorporate this practice using seeded forages. Volesky
thinks the concept has practical application in Nebraska but suggests
trying it first in a small area.
The
Sampson Range and Pasture Management Endowment helped fund this
research.
-
Cheryl Alberts
|