|
Sweltering
sun in rainless skies. Hot, dry winds. Parched pastures, shriveled
crops and water shortages.
Some version
of this scorching scenario plays out every year in the United States.
Drought plagues at least 10 percent of the nation annually, costing
roughly $6 billion to $8 billion.
Drought is
inevitable. Planning is society's best defense, said Don Wilhite,
director of the National Drought Mitigation Center at the University
of Nebraska. Drought is a normal part of climate throughout the
United States. Governments that anticipate risks and minimize them
will be best prepared when drought hits.
The center,
established in 1995, aims to help reduce society's vulnerability
to drought. Its research aids drought planning, forecasting, monitoring
and coordination.
"The idea
of mitigation is to take actions before drought to reduce your vulnerability
or improve your ability to cope with it and recover," he said.
"You can't reduce all the risks, but if people think about
where, when and why they're vulnerable, they may be able to employ
strategies to reduce vulnerability."
Drought planning
has changed in recent years. In the 1980s, it focused on responding
to drought, or crisis management. The center advocates more proactive
planning that includes risk assessment and management, and preparation.
"It's
much more cost-effective to invest in pre-drought kinds of programs
to lessen risk than to try to provide relief after drought occurs,"
Wilhite said. "That relief does nothing to reduce risks for
the next drought. If you adopt a risk management program, that's
long-term."
Wilhite is
revising a widely used planning tool he developed earlier to better
emphasize risk assessment and mitigation. It's based on his 20 years
of drought research. His step-by-step process outlines information
governments need to create drought plans.
"It's
generic. Whether they're in Illinois, Atlanta or Brazil, anyone
should be able to follow the process, adapt it to their needs and
develop a drought plan," he explained.
For example,
if a community identifies water supplies as a weakness, it might
drill new wells, arrange for backup sources or launch water conservation
efforts before drought.
The center
assists governments with drought planning. Staff recently helped
New Mexico with a plan that emphasizes mitigation and preparedness
rather than response. A similar process is under way for Nebraska,
which is updating its 1988 plan. More than 30 states now have drought
plans, compared with three in 1982.
Researchers
also seek better forecasting and monitoring tools. The center helped
the Western Governors' Association's Western Drought Coordination
Council create a regional drought and water supply monitoring system.
This system provides a comprehensive picture of regional conditions
for policy-makers, states, federal agencies and others.
"We pushed
for a regional monitoring system. The next step is a national integrated
monitoring system," Wilhite said. "I think that will happen
in two or three years."
It's important
to better understand drought characteristics, frequency and severity,
and society's changing vulnerability.
"Lots
of things have changed in a positive way over the years but other
things have increased our vulnerability. We need to be aware of
those things," Wilhite said. "We have more people, they're
more concentrated in urban areas, there's more demand for water
and more interest in the environment."
What if a drought
as severe and long as the 1930s strikes today?
"The perception
is that because of all we've learned and all the new technology,
the impacts wouldn't be nearly as great. I would say the impacts
would be different but actually would be greater. Our economy has
changed a lot. The dollar costs would go through the ceiling."
A USDA special
grant funds the center.
-
Vicki Miller
|