|
The
sun's rays can harm anyone's skin or eyes, but sun protection is
especially critical for people who have skin cancer or are undergoing
radiation or chemotherapy.
For
cancer patients, sun-protective clothing may help prevent illness
or even death.
Consumers
need assurance that clothing being marketed as sun protective does
indeed protect against harmful ultraviolet radiation.
A
University of Nebraska textile scientist's research on ultraviolet
protective fabrics is helping clothing manufacturers and consumers
make better-informed decisions about sun-protective clothing and
helped lay groundwork for establishing national standards.
Patricia
Crews' work yielded some surprising results. While studying whether
ultraviolet absorbers remain effective after laundering, Crews found
that washing actually enhances sun protection in cotton fabrics
because most commercial detergents contain optical brightening agents
that absorb or deflect UV rays.
Crews
also helped develop a simple method for measuring UV transmission
through fabrics and for calculating a textile's Ultraviolet Protection
Factor (UPF) factor, which is similar to sunscreen's sun protection
factor.
"Most
manufacturers must have this testing performed for them by a textile
testing service such as ours at UNL," the Institute of Agriculture
and Natural Resources scientist said.
Crews'
research helped her become a leader in establishing U.S. standards
for sun-protective clothing, which were finalized in 2000. She chaired
the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists committee
and was secretary of the American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) committee.
These
committees created standards for how textiles should be prepared
for UV transmission testing. They developed a standard prescribing
how UV-protective clothing should be labeled with a UPF number,
which ranges from 15 to 50+. The higher the UPF, the longer a person
can stay in the sun before skin under the fabric becomes red.
The
Federal Trade Commission and the Consumer Products Safety Commission
worked together with ASTM members to develop the standards, Crews
said. These agencies strive to assure that all textile products
claiming to be UV-protective are prepared, tested and labeled according
to standards Crews helped develop.
Standards
are voluntary but the clothing industry is being urged to quickly
adopt them for its own legal protection and, ultimately, for consumers'
health and safety.
"The
government would prefer that the clothing industry self-govern and
self-regulate itself," said Crews, a College of Human Resources
and Family Sciences scientist.
Questions
to the Consumer Product Safety Commission about the effectiveness
of sun-protective clothing helped spur the standards' creation.
A
minimal amount of sun exposure may be healthy, but prolonged exposure
to ultraviolet radiation increases the risk of reddening skin, wrinkles,
premature aging and skin cancer. More than 1.3 million new cases
of skin cancer are diagnosed annually in the United States, Crews
said.
A
niche market has developed for sun-protective clothing that better
protects against UV rays than most conventional clothing.
"The
problem is that sun-protective clothing manufacturers face a confusing
array of published research that contains many contradictory claims,"
Crews said. Her research allayed some fears. Because it showed laundering
increases the UPF, Crews said, "it assured the clothing industry
that the rating the clothing or textile was given when it was new
was going to remain the same."
She
wants to more clearly define the influence of fiber type and fabric
porosity, thickness and thread count on the UV-blocking properties
of undyed fabrics. Her findings thus far indicate fabric porosity
is the single best predictor of UV-blocking capacity. Fiber type
and thickness also are important.
Polyester,
silk and wool fabrics are better UV blockers than cotton or rayon
when porosity and thickness are factored in, she said.
Her
research has a personal dimension. Crews had skin cancer and one
of her closest high school friends died of malignant melanoma, the
rarest, but most deadly, skin cancer.
"Those
things really sparked an even greater interest and commitment than
I might otherwise have had," Crews said.
The
USDA helped fund this research.
Linda Ulrich
|